BIG BANG: THE BIBLE TAUGHT IT FIRST

 

By Hugh Ross, Ph.D

Most science textbooks that address cosmology credit Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson with the discovery that the universe arose from a hot big bang creation event. While it is true that they were the first (1965) to detect the radiation left over from the creation event,1 they were not the first scientists to recognize that the universe expanded from an extremely hot and compact state. In 1946 George Gamow calculated that nothing less than the universe expanding from a near infinitely hot condition could account for the present abundance of elements.2 In 1929 observations made by Edwin Hubble established that the velocities of galaxies result from a general expansion of the universe.3 Beginning in 1925 Abbé Georges Lemaître, who was both an astrophysicist and a Jesuit priest, was the first scientist to promote a big bang creation event.4

The first direct scientific evidence for a big bang universe dates back to 1916. That is when Albert Einstein noted that his field equations of general relativity predicted an expanding universe.5 Unwilling to accept the cosmic beginning implied by such expansion, Einstein altered his theory to conform with the common wisdom of his day, namely an eternally existing universe.6

All these scientists, however, were upstaged by 2500 years and more by Job, Moses, David, Isaiah, Jeremiah, and other Bible authors. The Bible’s prophets and apostles stated explicitly and repeatedly the two most fundamental properties of the big bang, a transcendent cosmic beginning a finite time period ago and a universe undergoing a general, continual expansion. In Isaiah 42:5 both properties were declared, “This is what the Lord says—He who created the heavens and stretched them out.”

The Hebrew verb translated “created” in Isaiah 42:5 is bara’ which has as its primary definition “bringing into existence something new, something that did not exist before.”7 The proclamation that God created (bara’) the entirety of the heavens is stated seven times in the Old Testament. (Genesis 1:1; 2:3; 2:4; Psalm 148:5; Isaiah 40:26; 42:5; 45:18). This principle of transcendent creation is made more explicit by passages like Hebrews 11:3 which states that the universe that we humans can measure and detect was made out of that which we cannot measure or detect. Also, Isaiah 45:5-22; John 1:3; and Colossians 1:15-17 stipulate that God alone is the agent for the universe’s existence. Biblical claims that God predated the universe and was actively involved in causing certain effects before the existence of the universe is not only found in Colossians 1 but also in Proverbs 8:22-31; John 17:24; Ephesians 1:4; 2 Timothy 1:9; Titus 1:2; and 1 Peter 1:20.

The characteristic of the universe stated more frequently than any other in the Bible is its being “stretched out.” Five different Bible authors pen such a statement in eleven different verses: Job 9:8; Psalm 104:2; Isaiah 40:22; 42:5; 44:24; 45:12; 48:13; 51:13; Jeremiah 10:12; 51:15; and Zechariah 12:1. Job 37:18 appears to be a twelfth verse. However, the word used for “heavens” or “skies” is shehaqîm which refers to the clouds of fine particles (of water or dust) that are located in Earth’s atmosphere,8 not the shamayim, the heavens of the astronomical universe.9 Three of the eleven verses, Job 9:8; Isaiah 44:24; and 45:12 make the point that God alone was responsible for the cosmic stretching.

What is particularly interesting about the eleven verses is that different Hebrew verb forms are used to describe the cosmic stretching. Seven verses, Job 9:8; Psalm 104:2; Isaiah 40:22; 42:5; 44:24; 51:13; and Zechariah 12:1 employ the Qal active participle form of the verb natah. This form literally means “the stretcher out of them” (the heavens) and implies continual or ongoing stretching. Four verses, Isaiah 45:12; 48:13; and Jeremiah 10:12; 51:15 use the Qal perfect form. This form literally means that the stretching of the heavens was completed or finished some time ago.

That the Bible really does claim that the stretching out of the heavens is both “finished” and “ongoing” is made all the more evident in Isaiah 40:22. There we find two different verbs used in two different forms. In the first of the final two parallel poetic lines, “stretches out” is the verb natah in the Qal active participle form. In the second (final) line the verb “spreads them out” (NASB, NIV, NKJV) is mathah (used only this one time in the Old Testament) in the waw consecutive plus Qal imperfect form, so that literally we might translate it “and he has spread them out . . .” The participles in lines one and three of Isaiah 40:22 characterize our sovereign God by His actions in all times, sitting enthroned above the earth and stretching out the heavens, constantly exercising his creative power in His ongoing providential work. This characterization is continued with reference to the past by means of waw consecutive with the imperfect, the conversive form indicating God’s completed act of spreading out the heavens. That is, this one verse literally states that God is both continuing to stretch out the heavens and has stretched them out.

This simultaneously finished and ongoing aspect of cosmic stretching is identical to the big bang concept of cosmic expansion. According to the big bang, at the creation event all the physics (specifically, the laws, constants, and equations of physics) are instantly created, designed, and finished so as to guarantee an ongoing, continual expansion of the universe at exactly the right rates with respect to time so that physical life will be possible.

This biblical claim for simultaneously finished and ongoing acts of creation, incidentally, is not limited to just the universe’s expansion. The same claim, for example, is made for God’s laying Earth’s foundations (Isaiah 51:3; Zechariah 12:1). This is consistent with the geophysical discovery that certain long-lived radiometric elements were placed into the earth’s crust a little more than four billion years ago in just the right quantities so as to guarantee the continual building of continents.

Finally, the Bible indirectly argues for a big bang universe by stating that the laws of thermodynamics, gravity, and electromagnetism have universally operated throughout the universe since the cosmic creation event itself. In Romans 8 we are told that the entire creation has been subjected to the law of decay (the second law of thermodynamics). This law in the context of an expanding universe establishes that the cosmos was much hotter in the past. In Genesis 1 and in many places throughout Job, Psalms, and Proverbs we are informed that stars have existed since the early times of creation. As explained in two Reasons To Believe books,10 even the slightest changes in either the laws of gravity or electromagnetism would make stars impossible. As already noted in the accompanying article, gravity, electromagnetism, and thermodynamics yield stable orbits of planets around stars and of electrons around the nuclei of atoms only if they operate in a universe described by three very large rapidly expanding dimensions of space.

References:

  1. Arno A. Penzias and Robert W. Wilson, “A Measurement of Excess Antenna Temperature at 4080 Mc/s,” Astrophysical Journal142 (1965): 419-21.
  2. George Gamow, “Expanding Universe and the Origin of the Elements,” Physical Review70 (1946): 572-73.
  3. Edwin Hubble, “A Relation Between Distance and Radial Velocity Among Extra-Galactic Nebulae,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 15 (1929): 168-73.
  4. Georges Lemaître, “A Homogeneous Universe of Constant Mass and Increasing Radius Accounting for the Radial Velocity of Extra-Galactic Nebulae,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society91 (1931): 483-90. The original paper appears in French in Annales de la Societé Scientifique de Bruxelles, Tome XLVII, Serie A, Premiere Partie(April, 1927): 49.
  5. Albert Einstein, “Die Grundlage der allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie,” Annalen der Physik49 (1916): 769-822. The English translation is in The Principle of Relativity by H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, and H. Weyl with notes by A. Sommerfeld and translated by W. Perrett and G. B. Jeffrey (London: Methuen and Co., 1923), 109-64.
  6. Albert Einstein, “Kosmologische Betrachtungen zur allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie,” Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussichen Akademie der Wissenschaften(1917), Feb. 8, 142-52. The English translation is in The Principle of Relativity, 175-88.
  7. R. Laird Harris, Gleason L. Archer, and Bruce K. Waltke, Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament1 (Chicago: Moody, 1980), 127.
  8. Harris, Archer, and Waltke, vol. 2, 916.
  9. Harris, Archer, and Waltke, 935.
  10. Hugh Ross, The Creator and the Cosmos, 2d ed. (Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress, 1995), 115-16; Hugh Ross, The Fingerprint of God, 2d ed. (Orange, CA: Promise Publishing, 1991), 84-87.

6 Responses to “BIG BANG: THE BIBLE TAUGHT IT FIRST”

  1. Poptart Pete Says:

    People were reading the Bible for 2500 years and yet it still didn’t dawn on anyone that the big bang model allegedly contained in it was a decent model for understanding the creation of the universe. Maybe then, it doesn’t contain the big bang model. Maybe the big bang model was a modern invention and people are now looking at the Bible through the eyes of a modern person and finding things that resemble modern ideas. It is like claiming you predicted something by reviewing after the fact what was said before. If I said an accident is going to happen and then some months later I drive by a car accident, claiming that I predicted it as I look back on what I said is still not necessarily true. I didn’t know the future. I didn’t see the future. I didn’t necessarily have any information that was from the future about a specific future event. And importantly there was nothing so specific about what I said that could lead one to look in the right place at the right time to see a specific event that I was talking about. All there is is a retrospective look and a discovery of something that bears a resemblance to my original statement. But like a broken clock that is right twice a day, it isn’t because I was right. This is how the Nostradamus believers work. They don’t read his verses and say in two years, on April 24th the president of Burundi is going to be found guilty of loitering and be sentenced to jail for three days. Instead they read the verses and look for similarities between the verses and historical events and then claim that the event was predicted by Nostradamus. Nobdody read the verse before the historical event happened and was able to know that the event was going to happen. The appearance of prediction is an illusion. Also, those people who look at the Bible and say it knew what science knows today maybe also want the credibilty of science to apply to the Bible. But don’t forget, the Bible says things like a lady and a snake had a conversation and the snake was able to outsmart the lady. I would be being kind by saying this is dubious. Also dubious is the notion that an invisible man in the sky made a first human out of dirt; a fully formed, parentless human being with no childhood, no learning experience, no time to learn how to walk, talk, coordinate movement, or in any way prepare himself for living. He just came into existence and had all that he needed instantaneously. Now, science does not lead us to believe that that happened. So what do you make of that discrepancy? Do you think the Bible was right about the big bang? Is it wrong about the creation of humans? Or is it right about that too? Or, as I suspect, it is wrong about the creation of humans because it is a fictional story and accidentally bears resemblance to our current model of the origin of the universe, because it too is based upon fiction.

  2. Ellen Says:

    Hi! Poptart:

    Thank you for your post that made me think harder.

    Yes, it is possible to read the modern science into Bible as you said. On the other hand, I think we can look from a negative perspectives and see if Genesis and other OT Bible verses still hold water today even cosmology itself has been through lots of dramatic changes in just 100 years. Many mythologies of creation stories have long failed to hold the water at all. We have to think why physicists still can apply their modern science into OT Bible that was written more than 2000 years ago.

    Furthermore, I am glad that you pointed out the predictions of Nostradamus are not specific at all. On the contrary, there are so many prophecies that are very specific and very detailed in OT Bible. For example, Persian king Cyrus was named by Isaiah long before he was born. Jesus’ birth was prophesied roughly more than 700 years ago before He was born and the odd of His fulfilling all the prophecies through the ages is very slim if even possible. Some events were mentioned but not designated any particular person to do it; that applies to the case of Judas the betrayer who chose to betrayed his Master for 30 pieces of silver. Judas was responsible for his own action because he fulfilled the prophecy of a loose nature.

    The consensus of the talking snake is it was the spokesperson of Satan.
    Satan’s cunning scheme today is that most people are not aware of its existence. Put Satan into the equation then we will see the whole picture more clearly. The good news is Satan is in chain though still roaming around after Jesus’ resurrection. Satan is like a roaring lion trying to devour those who fall into its traps. Beware of Satan!!

  3. John Says:

    It’s always interesting to read comments on re-posted articles like this one. I had forgotten about Poptart Pete. Good comment, Ellen.

  4. Ellen Says:

    Hi! John:
    Thank you for reposting this article.
    I’ve forgotten that I had commented on this article before. It is a joyous surprise to reread what I wrote.

    A few days ago CNN has reported about discovery on a massive ring around Saturn.

    …The obvious question: Why did it take scientists so long to discover something so massive?

    The ring is made up of ice and dust particles that are so far apart that “if you were to stand in the ring, you wouldn’t even know it,” Verbiscer said in a statement.

    Also, Saturn doesn’t receive a lot of sunlight, and the rings don’t reflect much visible light…

    So the massive ring is invisible for so long until now.

    I just want to remind our skeptical friends who believe only in science that science’s new discoveries may surprise them again and again.

    In a word, God may yet deliver a new message to them through new scientific discoveries.

    Thank you for all your hard works!
    God bless!

  5. John Says:

    Well said, Ellen. Thanks for sharing.

  6. Ellen Says:

    Hi! John:

    I’ve tried to say,
    if scientists could miss seeing such a massive ring for so long, so our skeptic friends here could have missed seeing a massive ring of truth in Christianity for so long too, right?

    I pray that they will soon discover our invisible God who is Spirit and not in their material box yet His fingerprints are everywhere in this universe.

Leave a Reply